Cosine theory model of total human resources in th

  • Detail

It is almost impossible to analyze the total amount of human resources in a complex organizational structure and establish a mathematical model. Therefore, it is necessary to reasonably simplify the complex organizational structure of enterprises in reality. For the convenience of research, we take an enterprise with organizational structure as the object (see Figure 1) for analysis and derivation. Figure 1 enterprise organization structure for analysis and model building figure 1 several bases, such as the determination of this concept. As the basic composition of the enterprise, each individual member, including factory directors, managers and workers, is the most basic unit of the total human resources of the enterprise. In order to further explore the situation of individual human resources, we must first clearly determine the following concepts. 1.1 individual's internal direction

internal direction refers to the joint action of internal factors such as individual members' talents, interests, needs, quality structure, personality, knowledge level and spiritual quality, which makes them most suitable for the direction of engaging in a certain occupation. This direction is the direction of its enthusiasm and maximum potential

for example, Qi Baishi's internal direction is painting, romance Roland's internal direction is literary creation, and Iacocca and Mary Kay's internal direction is to operate and manage enterprises. 1.2 direction angle

People's actual occupation is often inconsistent with their internal direction. It is vividly called "there is an included angle between career direction and internal direction". We call this "included angle" as the included angle of direction (see Figure 2). Figure 2 included angle in direction θ The included angle in the direction of the schematic diagram exists objectively, which can be verified by many people. For example, Mary Kay once had an assistant secretary. She worked in Mary Kay's company for more than 4 months, but she couldn't adapt to her work. She loves the company very much, not that she doesn't want to do a good job. Mary Kay transferred her to the accounting department after a deep talk with her, which proved that she had a first-class performance in the new department. Obviously, there was a large angle between the direction of the employee at the beginning, and her internal direction was closer to the accounting profession. 1.3 energy rice husk powder power

here refers to the part where employees' personal potential can produce results in their work under the condition of being mobilized to the greatest extent (the internal direction is consistent with the direction of their profession). 1.4 management efficacy and its amplification effect

effective management can make the overall ability of an organization greater than the simple superposition of its individual abilities. This ability of managers is called management efficacy. That is, effective management has a magnifying effect on the working effect of the management object. In essence, management effectiveness is the embodiment of managers' working ability

in economic activities, the amplification effect of this kind of management exists mainly for the following reasons:

1) effective management can motivate employees and mobilize their enthusiasm for work; 2) Effective people want to buy a relatively low price tensile testing machine. Management can improve the professional quality and spiritual quality of employees; 3) Managers can summarize and promote the work experience found and accumulated by employees at a higher level, and sublimate it into a mature specification of technology or management. Today, we will know the accounting options to enlarge the overall capacity of the organization; 4) With their strategic vision and management ability, senior managers can better avoid environmental threats and capture market opportunities, so as to improve the adaptability and competitiveness of enterprises

2 Establishment of the total human resources model of enterprises 2.1 analysis of individual work status

we choose the ability and direction angle of each member as the economic independent variable to study, and specify the following symbols:

atji - the ability of the I worker in the J Team of the T workshop

θ Tji - the included angle of the direction of the ith worker in the J Team of the T workshop

atj - the ability of the team leader of team J in workshop T

θ TJ - the included angle of the direction of the team leader of team J in workshop T

at - the ability of the T workshop director

θ T - the included angle of the T workshop director

a0 - the ability of the factory director

θ 0 - the included angle of the direction of the factory director. Figure 3 the working state analysis of an individual is shown in Figure 3. It is assumed that the ability of a member is a (expressed in the length of line segment OA), and the included angle of direction is θ, The component of OA in the direction irrelevant to occupation is oc=oasin θ, This component does not play any role in the work; And the component of OA in career direction is ob=oacos θ, This component is the part that the member produces actual results in his work, so we can get the formula of individual work effect in the enterprise (work effect is expressed in W):w=acos θ (1) This formula is applicable to any member of the enterprise. 2.2 total human resources of the team

it is assumed that xtj represents the total human resources of team J in workshop T, KTJ represents the management efficacy of the team leader of team J in workshop T, and wtji represents the work effect of the ith employee in the team. According to formula (1), wtji=atjicos θ tji (2)

Ktj=Atjcos θ TJ (3) obviously, simply multiply the work effectiveness of the staff in the team by the management effectiveness of the manager (team leader) to get the total human resources of the team: 2901.gif (1338 bytes)

Copyright © 2011 JIN SHI